Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Simmons

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1894No. 17,189PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Howard Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

The appellant was indicted hy the grand jury of Cass county, for murder in the first degree, in the killing of one James Oscar Walton, and after procuring a change of venue to the Howard Circuit Court, applied for and obtained the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus, upon which an issue was properly formed and submitted to the judge of the Howard Circuit Court, who found that the appellant should not be admitted to bail.

It is conceded that one under indictment for murder is not entitled to bail when the proof is evident or the presumption is strong. Such is the rule under the constitution,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex parte HeffrenIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Ex parte MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Ex parte JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Ex parte KendallIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Ex parte RichardsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ford v. DilleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. State v. CrockerWyoming Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Loren Hamilton Fry v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Green v. Petit, SheriffIndiana Supreme Court · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API