Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Brown & Guenther & North Queensview Homes, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 18, 1963PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBastow, J.
In this proceeding petitioner’s application to stay arbitration has been denied upon the ground that an issue was presented for determination by the arbitrators and not the court as to whether respondent had made timely demand for arbitration. The conclusion of Special Term that arbitration should not be stayed was correct but not for the reasons stated by it.
The contract under consideration was made in June, 1953 between respondent, as owner, and petitioner, a firm of architects. Respondent was organized under the Redevelopment Companies Law of this State. (L. 1942, ch. 845, as amd.) We…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Soviero Bros. Contracting Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- South & Central American Commercial Co. v. Panama RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Sapinkopf v. Cunard Steamship Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- The President PolkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- J. Aron & Co. v. Panama RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
3Cited by11 opinions
- Candid Productions, Inc. v. International Skating UnionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Shamrock Holdings, Inc. v. Polaroid Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1989
- Hurlbut v. ChristianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Smile Train, Inc. v. Ferris Consulting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Practical Construction Company, a Corporation v. Granite City Housing Authority, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.