Citizens' Pipe Line Co. v. Twin City Pipe Line Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.
The presenil litigation began in this manner. The Harding Class Company, a corporation engaged in the manufacture of glass, required and used a large quantity of gas as fuel which it had contracted to purchase from the Twin City Pipe Line Company, a corporation engaged in the business of distributing natural gas in and within the vicinity of Port Smith, Arkansas. The glass company had for a time used the gas delivered by the pipe line company until, through the means of a subsidiary company, it acquired the control of certain gas wells in the State of Oklahoma. The stockholders of the glass…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Oelrichs v. SpainSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Russell v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- City of Yonkers v. Federal Sugar Refining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Oliphint v. Mansfield & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
- Citizens' Pipe Line Co. v. Twin City Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Carmical v. McAfeeCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
- Arkansas Oklahoma Gas Corp. v. Waelder Oil & Gas, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Leek v. BrasfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- Tolbert v. SamuelsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
- American Investors Life Insurance v. TCB Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.