Legal Opinion

Citizens' Pipe Line Co. v. Twin City Pipe Line Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 8, 1931PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.

The presenil litigation began in this manner. The Harding Class Company, a corporation engaged in the manufacture of glass, required and used a large quantity of gas as fuel which it had contracted to purchase from the Twin City Pipe Line Company, a corporation engaged in the business of distributing natural gas in and within the vicinity of Port Smith, Arkansas. The glass company had for a time used the gas delivered by the pipe line company until, through the means of a subsidiary company, it acquired the control of certain gas wells in the State of Oklahoma. The stockholders of the glass…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Oelrichs v. SpainSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Russell v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. City of Yonkers v. Federal Sugar Refining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Oliphint v. Mansfield & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
  5. Citizens' Pipe Line Co. v. Twin City Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Carmical v. McAfeeCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Arkansas Oklahoma Gas Corp. v. Waelder Oil & Gas, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Leek v. BrasfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  4. Tolbert v. SamuelsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  5. American Investors Life Insurance v. TCB Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API