Legal Opinion

Joseph Toussaint v. Daniel McCarthy Joseph Toussaint v. James Rowland, Director, California Department of Corrections Daniel Vasquez Robert Borg

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 27, 1991No. 87-2910, 89-15613PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOONAN, Circuit Judge:

These consolidated appeals involve a class of prisoners, who, as a class, are the toughest for a prison to handle. They are at the bottom of the social heap. They have, nonetheless, a human dignity and certain rights secured by the Constitution of the United States. The command of the Constitution has to be made concrete. At the same time prisons must be run by prison officials not judges. The tension between proper administrative discretion and necessary constitutional concreteness has produced this appeal, the fifth in this case.

The basic case was begun 17 years ago,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Joseph Toussaint, Plaintiffs/appellees/cross-Appellants v. Daniel McCarthy Defendants/appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. David R. Ruiz, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee v. W. J. Estelle, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Robert Westefer v. Michael NealCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. Bruce v. YlstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Bruce v. YlstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Madrid v. GomezDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
  5. Walker v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2003

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API