Legal Opinion

Shotts v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 2010No. 71S03-0905-CR-253PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

David Shotts was arrested in Indiana by local law enforcement officers who had been advised of an outstanding Alabama warrant for his arrest. In the course of the arrest, Shotts was found in possession of an unlicensed handgun, which resulted in charges of violations of Indiana law. We hold that the Indiana arrest in reliance on information from Alabama law enforcement officers and the National Crime Information Computer did not violate either the Fourth Amendment or the Indiana Constitution. The evidence of his possession of a handgun is therefore admissible in this Indiana…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. HobbsIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Trotter v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. David Wright v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Marcus Zanders v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Lawrence Gyamfi v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API