Legal Opinion

Slowley v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 2011Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Phyllis Orlikoff Flug, J.

Defendant Scripto-Tokai Corp. (hereinafter Scripto) moves for summary judgment, dismissing the complaint and all cross claims asserted against it. Defendants, the City of New York *954and the New York City Department of Education (hereinafter collectively referred to as City), separately move for summary judgment, dismissing the complaint and all cross claims asserted against it.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff on November 28, 2005 as a result of being severely burned when his shirt was set on…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Johnson v. Johnson Chemical Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API