Kahn v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HICKS, District Judge.
Kahn was convicted of perjury, and prosecutes this writ of error.
There are nine assignments of error, but we coniine our consideration of the case in this opinion to only those four raised and discussed in the brief. Rule 20 of this court; I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co., 272 U. S. 429, 47 S. Ct. 136, 71 L. Ed.-, decided Nov. 22, 1926, and Eastman Kodak Co. of New York v. Southern Photo Materials Co., 47 S. Ct. 400, 71 L. Ed.-, decided Feb. 21, 1927, both opinions by Mr. Justice Sanford.
First. It is insisted that there is no evidence showing the materiality of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Hanish v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1915
- Mullins Lumber Co. v. Williamson & Brown Land & Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1918
- Anderson Lumber Corp. v. LehtoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1922
3Cited by22 opinions
- Grand Trunk Western R. Co. v. HW Nelson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Stone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. Kentucky Utilities Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
- Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
- Hyney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.