Legal Opinion

United States v. Haak

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided October 18, 2016No. 15-CR-220(LJV)(JJM)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

LAWRENCE J. VILARDO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

DECISION AND ORDER FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF EVIDENCE

The defendant, John Haak, is charged in a one-count Indictment with possession with intent to distribute, and distribution of, fentanyl in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The Indictment also charges under § 841(b)(1)(C) that “death.. .resulted from the use of such substance.”

The defendant moved, inter alia, to suppress his statements made to government agents on March 4, 2015, and Magistrate Judge Jeremiah J. McCarthy issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. HaakCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  2. Alford v. NFTA-MetroDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2025
  3. Gordon v. Niagara Wheatfield Central School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2023
  4. Tojek v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2021
  5. United States v. BellDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API