Legal Opinion

Dawson v. Hickman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 14, 1936No. 4954PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELLERS, Justice.

L. Hickman as plaintiff brought this suit in trespass to try title against Ray Dawson and others holding under him to recover the 7/8 leasehold estate in .71-acre of land located in Rusk county, and a part of the W. W. Sims survey. The defendants by their answer pleaded not guilty, improvements in good faith, and by cross-action seek to recover title to the land. The case was tried without a jury and resulted in judgment for plaintiff for the leasehold estate in the land.Defendants recovered the value of their improvements. From this judgment, the ■defendants have prosecuted…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rio Bravo Oil Co. v. WeedTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Gulf Pro. Co. v. Angus SpearTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Texas Bitulithic Co. v. WarwickTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  4. Dutton v. VierlingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Texas Co. v. AndradeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pendery v. Panhandle Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  2. Gulf Production Co. v. BatonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Doyle v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  4. Strayhorn v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Reed v. Skelly Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API