Legal Opinion

State v. Sorenson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 2000No. NonePublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1.] Sorenson appeals from a judgment of conviction of simple assault, third offense, claiming that the trial court abused its discretion when it denied his motion to suppress based on violation of a discovery order and that it erred as a matter of law when it refused him credit on his sentence for time he spent at the Human Services Center undergoing psychiatric evaluation. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

[IT 2.] Sorenson assaulted Steve Gibson in Sorenson’s apartment after the two men had been drinking together. Sorenson was charged with simple assault, third offense. Prior to trial, his…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. OsterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. DeNoyerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. CodySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. HillNebraska Supreme Court · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. KrebsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. MoranSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. BurdickSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. City of Sioux Falls v. Missouri Basin Municipal Power AgencySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. SwalveSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API