Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Rector v. Northglenn Metropolitan Recreation District

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 26, 1965No. 21646Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Frantz

specially concurring:

I subscribe to all that is said in the majority opinion. *38But the majority opinion, in my view, does not go far enough; it answers only one question. I would resolve the issue raised by plaintiffs in error: Was the Brighton Blade a newspaper of “general circulation” within the meaning of the applicable statute?

C.R.S. ’53, 89-12-2(6), provides for “three consecutive weekly publications in at least one newspaper of general circulation in the district.” The determination of whether a newspaper is one of general circulation is ordinarily a question of fact. Board of County…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burak v. DitsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  2. State Ex Rel. Bowler v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Bd. of Com. of Decatur Co. v. Greensburg TimesIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Eisenberg v. WabashIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  5. In re House Resolution No. 10Supreme Court of Colorado · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API