Legal Opinion

Harahan v. AC & S, INC.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 23, 2003PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY OLSZEWSKI, J.:

¶ 1 This started as a suit against four dozen defendants, but this is an appeal to the grant of summary judgment in favor of just one — Amehem Products, Inc. (“Am-chen”), on behalf of the Benjamin Foster Division of Amehem. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand.

¶ 2 Appellant is the administratrix of the estate of her late husband and was substituted as a party after his death. In her first amended complaint, she alleged that her husband worked as a pipefitter in PECO facilities between 1972 and 2000, that he was exposed to asbestos-containing products…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gutteridge v. A.P. Green Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Eckenrod v. GAF Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Graham v. Today's SpiritSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. McNeal v. Eaton Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Krauss, C. v. Trane US Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Limbach Co., LLC v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Gibson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Weible v. Allied Signal, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Donoughe v. Lincoln Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API