Legal Opinion

Veith v. Horn

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 14, 1949PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff moves for an order pursuant to Rule 3:15-4 granting leave to her to file a supplemental complaint setting forth facts which occurred after the commencement of the action.

In the action, which was commenced on February 5, 1948, plaintiff as assignee of Durex Products, Inc., sued to recover on a note in the amount of $500, alleged to have been executed on November 5, 1947, by the defendant and payable to Durex Products, Inc., on February 1, 1948. Defendant interposed an answer and the suit is at issue.

In seeking to file a supplemental complaint, plaintiff wishes to add to the relief…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Texarkana v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Grobart v. Society for Establishing Useful ManufacturesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  3. Titus v. GunnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
  4. Mausert v. Mutual Distributing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
  5. Felt v. SteiglerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Balip Automotive Repairs, Inc. v. SchroederNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  2. Republic of China v. Pong-Tsu MowNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API