International Harvester Credit Corp. v. Gillis
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtNoren, J.
This is an appeal from the granting, after an evidentiary hearing, of a prejudgment remedy of replevin pursuant to the provisions of General Statutes §§ 52-278a to 52-278d. The defendant has appealed on the ground that the plaintiff did not meet its burden of establishing probable cause to sustain the validity of its claim.
Before discussing the merits of the appeal, it is necessary to deal with the plaintiffs motion to dismiss the appeal which was made prior to oral argument in this court. The defendant does not contest that subsequent to the hearing in the trial court it petitioned the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Three S. Development Co. v. SantoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Ledgebrook Condominium Assn., Inc. v. Lusk CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Augeri v. C. F. Wooding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Babiarz v. Hartford Special, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- Knights of Columbus Federal Credit Union v. SalisburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fleet Bk. v. Czaplicki, No. Pjr Cv-91-0702261s (Nov. 7, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991
- International Harvester Credit Corp. v. GillisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985