Legal Opinion

(PC) Reinhardt v. Hamlin

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 4, 2019No. 1:19-cv-00892Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID MICHAEL REINHARDT, 1:19-cv-00892-SKO (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SERVE COMPLAINT 13 v. 14 W. KENT HAMLIN, et al., (Doc. 18) 15 Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 16 (Doc. 27) 17 18 14-DAY DEADLINE 19 Clerk of Court to Assign a District Judge 20 21 Plaintiff David Michael Reinhardt, an inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, 22 alleges that California judges and justices are engaged in a conspiracy to deny his constitutional 23 rights by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Doe I v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API