Crow v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, P. J.
On information charging that in Cotton county, March 8, 1926, Newt Crow did willfully and unlawfully “manufacture a certain compound mixture, mash, wort and wash, fit for distillation and for the manufacture of ¡beer, distilled spirits and other alcoholic liquors,” he was convicted, the jury leaving the punishment to be fixed by the court. Motion for new trial was duly filed and overruled, whereupon the court pronounced judgment and sentenced the defendant to pay a fine of $50 and to imprisonment in the county jail for 80 days. To reverse the judgment he appeals.
A number of errors are…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Armstrong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- Selstrom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
3Cited by10 opinions
- Seymour v. SwartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Wilcox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
- Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1958
- Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1957
- Sealy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.