Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Farmers' Grain & Milling Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1927No. 4487PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCherry, J.

The plaintiff had a verdict and judgment for $3,500 damages for personal injuries, and the defendant appeals. The case is based on negligence under the doctrine of attractive nuisances or the “turntable cases.” The refusal of the trial court to direct- a verdict for defendant is the only assignment of error necessary to be considered.

The undisputed facts are that for 17 years the defendant owned and operated a grain elevator at Cache Junction, a village of 200 population, in Cache county, Utah. The grain elevator was situated and contained in a main building about 40 feet square, and 80 or 90…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United Zinc & Chemical Co. v. BrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Brown v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Smalley v. Rio Grande Western Ry. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1908
  4. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. FruchterSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Charvoz v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Loveland v. Orem City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Loveland v. Orem City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API