Legal Opinion

Valencia v. Continental Casualty Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1934No. 28978PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Leslie, District Judge.

This action is brought by appellant, Francisco Valencia, against the Continental Casualty Company, appellee, upon an accident policy, containing a health provision, issued by the defendant company to the plaintiff on the 10th day of October, 1928. The provision of the policy involved is as follows:

“The insurance given by this policy is * * * against loss of time resulting solely from bodily sickness which is contracted and begins not less than fifteen days after the date of this policy.”

At the time of issuance of the policy, plaintiff was employed by the Union Pacific…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cohen v. North American Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  2. Smith v. Benefit Assn. of Railway EmployeesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Davis v. Natchez Hotel Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Davidson v. First American InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Broccolo v. Horace Mann Mutual Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  3. Craig v. Central National Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
  4. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  5. Jefferson Life Casualty Company v. BevillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API