Legal Opinion

United States Plywood Corp. v. Neidlinger

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 4, 1963PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

The defendant Neidlinger had for many years conducted a business which involved his purchase of plywood materials and their installation in buildings under construction. In 1959, he discovered that his trusted bookkeeper had embezzled about $200,000 and, as a result, the business was insolvent. He consulted his attorney, the late Alfred J. Peer, who scheduled a meeting for May 18, 1959. The notice of the meeting was addressed to each of the defendant’s creditors and stated that cooperation “with respect to the settlement of the various claims” was required “in order to effect some…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Gagnon Co., Inc. v. Nevada Desert InnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Susquehanna Chemical Corp. v. Producers Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  5. Cohen v. GoldmanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Walker v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
  2. Amatuzzo v. KozmiukNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  3. United States v. LightmanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
  4. Newark Branch, National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Township of West OrangeDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
  5. Burnett v. County of GloucesterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API