Legal Opinion
Freitag v. Bersano
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 4, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The bill of complaint herein was filed by Elizabeth H. Freitag in her individual name, but it is apparent that the relief she seeks is as an executrix under the will of her mother, Ida W. Hawthorne.
The bill is inartistically drawn but the substance to be gathered from its allegations, aided by the schedules annexed thereto, is as follows: Complainant and Mamie Bersano are daughters of Ida W. Hawthorne and are the executrices under her will. Emile Bersano, husband of said Mamie Bersano, presented to said executrices a claim for $2,772.32 against Mrs. Hawthorne's estate, for maintenance of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wood v. ChetwoodNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1888
- Alpaugh v. WilsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1894
- Ward v. McLellanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- Gray v. GraySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1885
- Petty v. YoungSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1887
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Zurzola v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Lang v. LangBergen County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1946
- Immer v. RiskoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Koplik v. C. P. Trucking Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Rose Zurzola and Matthew Zurzola, Husband and Wife v. General Motors Corporation, in 73-1983 v. Matthew Zurzola, Third-Party-Defendant, and Jack Mutchnick and Deville Leasing Corporation, Third-Party-Defendants. Appeal of Jack Mutchnick, in 73-1959. Rose Zurzola v. Jack Mutchnick, and Deville Leasing Corporation v. Matthew Zurzola, Third-Party-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974