Jackson v. Brown
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*416OPINION
By HORNBECK, PJ.
Because all living parties in interest seek partition we are not favored by brief supporting the position of the trial- court in refusing to grant the prayer of the parties.
It is - stated in the brief tendered by counsel for Brown, individually and as trustee, that in probability the action of the trial court was based upon Embleton v McMechen, 110 Oh St, 18, and particularly the third syllabus thereof:
“In this state life tenants cannot compel the remaindermen to suffer partition of their interests,”
This is a statement of a well known principle and Judge Jones in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Peck v. WatsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Carneal v. LynchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
- Allen v. LibbeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
- Eversole v. CombsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Teasley v. HulmeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Collins v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
- Heiden v. HowesOhio Court of Appeals · 1945
- Stephan v. WacasterOhio Court of Appeals · 2025