Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Brown

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1934No. 330PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*416OPINION

By HORNBECK, PJ.

Because all living parties in interest seek partition we are not favored by brief supporting the position of the trial- court in refusing to grant the prayer of the parties.

It is - stated in the brief tendered by counsel for Brown, individually and as trustee, that in probability the action of the trial court was based upon Embleton v McMechen, 110 Oh St, 18, and particularly the third syllabus thereof:

“In this state life tenants cannot compel the remaindermen to suffer partition of their interests,”

This is a statement of a well known principle and Judge Jones in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peck v. WatsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  2. Carneal v. LynchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  3. Allen v. LibbeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  4. Eversole v. CombsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  5. Teasley v. HulmeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Collins v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Heiden v. HowesOhio Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Stephan v. WacasterOhio Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API