Legal Opinion

Allen v. Libbey

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 3, 1885PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtW. Allen, J.

This is a petition for partition of land of which Joseph Libbey, in 1874, died seised, brought by a purchaser of sixty-five three-hundredths of the land, being the shares of certain of his heirs, against the widow and the other heirs. The widow alone defends. Joseph Libbey died childless and intestate, and his widow, by force of the Gen. Sts. c. 90, § 15, became seised, as tenant for life, of an undivided half of the land of which partition is sought. Sears v. Sears, 121 Mass. 267. The other respondents and the petitioner hold the entire interest in the land except the life estate of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sears v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  2. Taylor v. BlakeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ciani v. MacGrathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
  2. Hershman-Tcherepnin v. TcherepninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  3. Tower v. TowerIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Baker v. BakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  5. Bernat v. KiviorMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API