Legal Opinion

Kyle v. Jordan

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 10, 1913PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Gadsden City Court. Heard before Hon. John H. Disque. ' Ejectment by S. E. Jordan against R. B. Kyle. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

MAYFIELD, J.(1) When this case was here on former appeal, we ruled that the supplemental writing, on a separate piece of paper, containing additional matter of description to that in the deed, was admissible in evidence as a part of the deed, under the evidence as it then appeared of record. See 187 Ala. 355, 65 South. 522. The authorities on the subject of -the admissibility in evidence of separate writings, not signed, as parts of deeds or wills, were reviewed at some length; and in holding-the separate writing in this case to be admissible as supplementing the deed in question, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Beckwith v. TalbotSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Jenkins v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  3. Lockbihler v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Salmon Falls Manufacturing Co. v. GoddardSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  5. Brayn's Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Cook v. MortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  3. Sorrells v. Bailey Cattle Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Caron v. TeagleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  5. Johnston v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API