Legal Opinion

Town of Lake Hamilton v. Hughes

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 29, 1948PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNS, J.:

Upon the remand of this case upon a former appeal the Chancellor entered the decree now appealed. Appellants submit that this latter decree was rendered without notice to them. The decree is silent in this respect.

Although notice is not always necessary, it may well be stated that in contested adversary proceedings no decree ought to be entered against a party who ought to have notice. Notice should be given in order that there be fair play; that the Chancellor be protected against error; and in order to avoid appeals and reviews.

About three hundred years ago it was provided in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Town of Lake Hamilton v. HughesSupreme Court of Florida · 1947

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ries Flooring Co. v. Dileno Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PellerOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Brooker v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  4. Williams v. RichardsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API