Legal Opinion
Brooker v. Smith
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 26, 1958No. 496PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
101 So.2d 607 (1958)
Tom BROOKER, for himself and on behalf of all other taxpayers in the City of Naples, Florida, similarly situated, Appellant,
v.
W. Roy SMITH, individually, and as Mayor of the City of Naples, Florida, a municipal corporation, Appellee.
No. 496.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.
March 26, 1958.
John W. Wright and Daniel Neal Heller, Miami, for appellant.
Sheppard & Woolslair, Ft. Myers, for appellee.
2Per curiam
The appellant filed a suit in equity against W. Roy Smith, individually, and as Mayor of the City of Naples, Florida. The complaint alleged that the defendant, as…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Mayflower Investment Co. v. BrillSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
- Town of Lake Hamilton v. HughesSupreme Court of Florida · 1948
4Cited by7 opinions
- Harris and Company Advertising, Inc. v. Republic of CubaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- Ries Flooring Co. v. Dileno Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1977
- State Department of Transportation v. PlunskeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PellerOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
- Ingaglio v. EnnisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.