Haynie v. Milan Exchange. Inc.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the CourtMatherne, J.
The complainant, Mrs. Mattie Pearce Haynie brought suit in equity to recover of the defendants Bill Gardner and wife Mary Lynn Gardner and The Milan Exchange, Inc., the balance due on a note executed by the defendants as a part of the purchase price of one hundred percent of the common stock of The Milan Exchange, Inc. sold by the complainant to the defendants Gardner, plus reasonable attorney’s fee.
The defendants Gardner by answer and cross-bill admit the note sued on but allege they are not liable because ' J. Frank Warmath, for a valuable consideration, agreed to hold them harmless on the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dillard & Coffin Co. v. Richmond Cotton Oil Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1918
- Perkins v. Trinity Realty Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
- McCampbell v. Fountain Head RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
- Sargent v. Palace Cafe Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Tennessee Ice Co. v. RaineTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Knox Kreations, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1979
- Cate v. NicelyDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1979
- Freeland v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2001