Coursolle v. Weyerhauser
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Itasca county, entered pursuant to findings by Holland, J.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This was an action to determine adverse claims to 320 acres of vacant and unimproved land in Itasca county. As the appeal is taken from the judgment, without either case or bill of exceptions, the only question is whether the facts found sustain the judgment.
These facts, so far as material, are substantially as follows: The plaintiff is a half-blood of the Sioux or Dakota tribe, and has been continuously a resident of Ramsey county, in this state, for at least 25 years. In 1856, pursuant to the act of congress of July 17, 1854, there was issued to him 320 acres of what is commonly called…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bool v. MixNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Craig v. Van BebberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- Whitney v. DutchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817
- Lewis & Pickering v. C. W. Williams & SonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1859
- St. Anthony Falls Water Power Co. v. EastmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Casey v. . KastelNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- King v. CordreySuperior Court of Delaware · 1935
- Kipp v. LoveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- King v. CordreySuperior Court of Delaware · 1935