Legal Opinion

Salnita Corp. v. Walter Holding Corp.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided July 31, 1933PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor:

The corporations for which receivers pendente lite are sought are holding companies. Annenberg holds fifty per cent, of the voting stock of each and is in control of their management. Each has four directors in office. He and his son are on the boards of each. So are Bannon and Murrhy, who hold the other fifty per cent, of the voting stock. From an investment *430standpoint, however, as distinguished from a voting one, the holdings of Bannon and Murray -of non-voting stock exceed those of Annenberg. The ratio of ownership of the two corporations is about sixty to forty and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Boothe v. Summit Coal Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Ellis v. Penn Beef Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1911
  3. Boyle v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Thoroughgood v. Georgetown Water Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1910
  5. Gray v. Council of Newark & the Newark Water & Electric Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Giuricich v. Emtrol Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  2. Daniel Cowin v. Charles S. BreslerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  3. Drob v. National Memorial Park, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1945
  4. Quadrant Structured Products Company, Ltd. v. VertinCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2015
  5. Lichens Co. v. Standard Commercial Tobacco Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API