Legal Opinion
McMurray v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 2, 2021No. 0:21-cv-00414Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA James McMurray, Civil No. 21-414 (DWF/DTS) Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AT&T Mobility Services, LLC, Defendant. Michael B. Healey, Esq., Wagoner, Falconer & Judd, Ltd., counsel for Plaintiff. Sara Brady Tomezsko, Esq., and Kenneth Gage, Esq., Paul Hastings LLC; Lauren Clements, Esq., and Shirley O. Lerner, Esq., Littler Mendelson, PC, counsel for Defendant. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on Defendant AT&T Mobility Services, LLC’s (“AT&T”) Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings. (Doc. No. 17 (“Motion”).)…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Rajesh Gupta v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.