Healy v. Hoy
Supreme Court of Minnesota
.After the former appeal, reported 112 Minn. 138, 12? N- - W. 482, the case was tried before Brill, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for .$4,334.50. From an order denying-defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, he appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
On July 10, 1909, the plaintiff’s intestate, Frank C. Healy, was personally injured, while working as a plumber on the St. Paul -Hotel, by the alleged negligence of the defendant in failing to guard a hbisting apparatus. He commenced this action against the defendant in’ the district court of the county of Ramsey to recover damages resulting from his injuries, and a verdict was directed for the defendant. He appealed to this court from an order denying his motion for a new trial. He died pending the appeal on March 4, 1910, and the plaintiff, as administrator, was substituted in his place,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. PabstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Hennessy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
- McKinstry v. CollinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1902
- Moores v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Rogers v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Beresford N. Springer v. Gretchen SeamanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Williams v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- John G. Marshall v. Jose E. Perez Arzuaga, and Third-Party Avis Rent-A-Car of Puerto Rico, Inc., Third-Party John G. Marshall v. Jose E. Perez ArzuagaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Dellwo v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Prescott v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.