Legal Opinion

H. E. Atterbury v. A. S. v. Carpenter

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 14, 1963No. 18403_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Atterbury pledged stock as-security for a loan made to another. The-borrower defaulted. Atterbury (with-jurisdiction founded upon diversity of' citizenship) has brought this action to-restrain the pledgee from selling the-stock. He contends that he has been discharged as surety because of changes-made in the loan agreement without his-consent. The district court held that Atterbury was an indemnitor and not a surety, and therefore was not entitled to-be discharged. The basic question upon-this appeal is whether the district court, erred in that holding.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Craswell v. BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Union Oil Co. of Calif. v. LullOregon Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Zuni Construction Co. v. Great American InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  2. United States v. Seaboard Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  3. A. J. Kellos Construction Co. v. Balboa InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1980
  4. Gellis v. S. Gellis & Co., Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1974
  5. 34 cont.cas.fed. (Cch) 75,340, 25 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 169 United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Seaboard Surety Company and the Home Insurance Company, Cross-Appellees. Seaboard Surety Company and the Home Insurance Company, Defendants-Third-Party v. Joseph Morton Company, Inc., Joseph J. Battaglia, and the Perkins & Will Partnership, Third-Party-DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API