Legal Opinion

Crippen v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 9, 2017No. CR-17-25Published

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

2017 Ark. 25

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS. No. CR-17-25 JAMES EDWARD CRIPPEN Opinion Delivered February 9, 2017 APPELLANT MOTION FOR RULE ON CLERK V. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE MOTION GRANTED. PER CURIAM Appellant James Edward Crippen, by and through his attorney Ryan Norris, has filed a motion for rule on clerk asking this court to direct our clerk to file the record on appeal. Counsel asserts that the record was timely when it was tendered on January 4, 2016. As explained below, the record was not timely pursuant to our rules, but we nonetheless grant the motion so that appellant’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Morris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Lee v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  4. Coakes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API