Legal Opinion
Dumbadze v. Lignante
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 23, 1926PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.
The court below has determined that this action is barred by the six-year Statute of Limitations; and that is the point on this appeal. Judgment was granted on motion under rule 107, subdivision 6, and is reported below (216 App. Div. 554).
We must, therefore, analyze the complaint.
The defendants are Eugene E. Lignante, a citizen and resident of New York, Anton Antonovich Knaap, of Warsaw, Poland, and Vasili Davidovich Zimdin of Berlin, Germany.
A syndicate was formed, including the plaintiff, Knaap and Zimdin, which procured a contract at Petrograd, Russia, for two million shrapnel shells.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Newton v. . PorterNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Keys v. LeopoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Wood v. . YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Minion v. . WarnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Dumbadze v. LignanteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
3Cited by26 opinions
- Zola v. GordonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Erbe v. Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Pereira v. Centel Corp. (In Re Argo Communications Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Keough v. St. Paul Milk Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Rattner v. YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.