Legal Opinion

In re Christopher Poverman

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 28, 2017No. 17-BG-570PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

On consideration of the certified order of the Maryland Court of Appeals indefinitely suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of Maryland by consent; this court’s June 9, 2017, order temporarily suspending respondent in this case and directing him to show cause why functionally equivalent reciprocal discipline should not be imposed; the statement of Disciplinary Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline; and it appearing that respondent did not filé a response to this court’s show cause order or file the required D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit, it is

ORDERED that…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re SibleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. In Re ColeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. In Re MaignanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Com. v. Hale, H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API