Kindred v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, Judge.
Once again, we consider the availability of the post-conviction relief process as a tool for continued attacks on a criminal conviction. Eleven years ago, appellant-defendant James H. Kindred was convicted of Theft, 1 a Class D felony, and Forgery, 2 a Class C felony. After unsuccessfully raising numerous issues for review on direct appeal and in his first petition for post-conviction relief, Kindred now challenges the post-conviction court’s summary demal of his successive petition. In particular, Kindred argues that the post-conviction court erred by: (1) permitting the State…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lowe v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Kindred v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
- Kindred v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
- Kindred v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
- Bivins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Anderson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Poling v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Johnson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- James R. Johnson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Jeremy Farris v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.