Legal Opinion

Kindred v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 1996No. 67A01-9607-PC-217PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, Judge.

Once again, we consider the availability of the post-conviction relief process as a tool for continued attacks on a criminal conviction. Eleven years ago, appellant-defendant James H. Kindred was convicted of Theft, 1 a Class D felony, and Forgery, 2 a Class C felony. After unsuccessfully raising numerous issues for review on direct appeal and in his first petition for post-conviction relief, Kindred now challenges the post-conviction court’s summary demal of his successive petition. In particular, Kindred argues that the post-conviction court erred by: (1) permitting the State…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lowe v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Kindred v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Kindred v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Kindred v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Bivins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Poling v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Johnson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. James R. Johnson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Jeremy Farris v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API