Legal Opinion
Kindred v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided June 8, 1988No. 285S67PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DICKSON, Justice.
Defendant-appellant James H. Kindred appeals his conviction following a jury trial for one count of perjury, a class D felony, (Ind.Code § 35-44-2-1) and two counts of forgery (uttering), a class C felony, (Ind. Code § 35-43-5-2). The jury acquitted the defendant of the charge of habitual offender. Finding aggravating circumstances, the trial court enhanced each sentence and ordered them to be served consecutively for a total of twenty years imprisonment. Defendant presents forty-nine (49) allegations of error in his appellate brief. We have regrouped these issues into the…
2Cases cited92 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Row v. HoltIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Bradford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. Haight-GyuroCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Dye v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.