Legal Opinion
Butler v. Kane
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 18, 1957No. 36846PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQuillian, J.
1. Special ground 5 of the amended motion for new trial assigns as error the following charge: “The plaintiff is entitled to recover if she proves to your satisfaction under the rules of law I give you in charge that the defendant was negligent as alleged in her petition as amended, and that her decedent was injured and death resulted from said injuries, and those injuries were sustained as the proximate result of said negligence.” In Everett v. Clegg, 213 Ga. 168, 170 (97 S. E. 2d 689) it was held: “The Court of Appeals held that the following charge of the court: ‘The plaintiff is entitled…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tietjen v. MeldrimSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Citizens & Southern National Bank v. KontzSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Everett v. CleggSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Morris v. WarlickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Savannah Electric Co. v. McClellandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bailey v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Southern Railway Co. v. GroganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Williams v. VinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Allstate Insurance v. BaughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Barlow v. StoryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.