Baldwin v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, C. J.
— THE LAW —
Judge J. Dudley Digges, writing for a unanimous Court of Appeals, declared that the Federal Wire Interception and Interception of Oral Communications sections (18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2520 (1976)) of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 "sets up a strict procedure that must be followed and we will not abide any deviation, no matter how slight, from the prescribed path.” (Emphasis in original.) State v. Siegel, 266 Md. 256, 274, 292 A.2d 86, 95 (1972), aff'g 13 Md. App. 444, 285 A.2d 671 (1971).
Although the above-quoted words of Siegel have not been chiseled into…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. SiegelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- State v. SiegelCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Poore v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ricks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Allen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Baldwin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Bell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- State v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.