Legal Opinion

Strabala v. Lewis

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 5, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Sioux District Court. — Hon. C. H. Lewis. Judge. This action involves the title of eighty acres of land. The plaintiff claims under a tax sale and deed, and the defendant is the owner of the patent title. There was a decree for the plaintiff, and defendant appeals

1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, C. J.

1. Tax sale and deed: statute of limitations. — I. It is conceded that the tax deed is in due form, and that there is no defect in any of the proceedings upon which it is based. ' x defendant is the owner of the patent title, and the only question presented by the appeal is whether the action is barred by the statute of limitations. It is provided by section 902 of the Code that “no action for the recovery of real property sold for the non-payment of taxes shall lie unless the same be brought within five years after the treasurer’s deed is executed and recorded.” It appears from the record…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hintrager v. HennessySupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  2. Hintrager v. TrautSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  3. Griffin v. TurnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  4. of Griffith v. CarterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  5. Francis v. GriffinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lindt v. UihleinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. Hall v. CardellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  3. Jefferson v. RustSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  4. McDonald v. KelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API