Hendrix v. Gore
Oregon Supreme Court
Appeal from Linn County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Kelly, C. J.:
In the early part of 1871, the appellants, who are husband and wife, erected a building for a hotel on two lots owned by the appellant, Henrietta B. Gore. In building and furnishing it they contracted debts with different persons, which they were unable to pay. Among these was one to Driggs and Carter, for two hundred and sixty-one dollars, for lumber and material used in the construction of the house, and another to one Farrier, for about one hundred dollars, for furniture put into it. Needing more money to furnish it, the appellants borrowed three hundred dollars…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Shirras & Others v. Caig & MitchelSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Divver & Gunton v. McLaughlinNew York Supreme Court · 1829
- Tully v. HarloeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Collins v. CarlileIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
- Trustees of South Baptist Church v. YatesNew York Court of Chancery · 1839
3Cited by9 opinions
- Nicklin v. Betts Spring Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1884
- Carey v. HerrickWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- Batten v. Jurist (Northwestern Nat. Bank, Etc., Co.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Weiser Loan & Trust Co. v. ComerfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
- United States National Bank v. EmbodyOregon Supreme Court · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.