Legal Opinion

Lindel Realty Company v. Miller

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 2, 1949PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a conflict between adjacent land owners over access to a state highway. The paved part of the highway is separated from the properties in question by a strip of land 16 feet wide which, although not presently used either as a roadway or as a sidewalk, is a part of the highway and owned by the State in fee. The defendants, who operate a gasoline filling station on their property, constructed a concrete exit drive across the unpaved portion of the highway to the roadway. But instead of building their exit at right angles to the line of the highway, they laid it out at an oblique angle…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barnett v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1856
  2. Manufacturers' Land & Improvement Co. v. Board of Commerce & Navigation & Southwark Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
  3. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. HannonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1875
  4. Manufacturers Land & Improvement Co. v. Board of Commerce & NavigationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. NJ Highway Authority v. JohnsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  2. WARREN FOUNDRY AND PIPE CORP v. Meriden Stone Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  3. Antonelli v. Planning Bd. of WaldwickNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  4. Good Deal of Ivy Hill, Inc. v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API