Legal Opinion

Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. Hannon

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 15, 1875PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In ejectment. On rule to show cause.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Beasley, Chief Justice.

This is an action of ejectment, the premises in dispute being a portion of the extensions of riparian land, by docking out into the Passaic river. The *277extension in question was made by a former land owner, under whom the plaintiff derives his title. The defendants own the contiguous lot, which is also riparian land. The principal legal question presented by the case is, the important one, with respect to the direction in which the riparian owner may extend his front into tide water. In the present case, the defendants insist that…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shedd v. American Maize Products Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Mutual Chemical Co. of America v. Mayor of BaltimoreDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1940
  3. Bailey v. DriscollNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  4. Lindel Realty Co. v. MillerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
  5. Lindel Realty Company v. MillerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API