Legal Opinion

Shaw v. McKenzie

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 13, 1932PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPattangall, C. J.

On motion. Real action. Verdict for plaintiffs. Defendant claims title to the property in question under a devise to her in the will of Martha E. Hawkes whose title depended upon a deed executed by her husband in 1901 but not recorded until 1912. He died testate in 1910, his will containing no specific mention of this property and giving his wife a life interest in the residuary estate. Plaintiffs claim title as remaindermen, asserting that the deed to Mrs. Hawkes was never delivered to her during her husband’s lifetime, and that therefore the property was a part of the residuary estate.

There…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Dodge v. Freedman's Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Stewart v. SilvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Osceola Land Co. v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  4. Gibney v. . MarchayNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  5. Latimer v. LatimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sargent v. CoolidgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. Goldthwaite v. Sheraton RestaurantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
  3. DeLong Ex Rel. Sampson v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  4. Waxler v. WaxlerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  5. Bradstreet v. BradstreetSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API