In Re Pyle
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Galen
Upon application made to this court March 4, 1925, a writ of habeas corpus was on that day issued by the court and made returnable before mo. The attorney general has appeared on behalf of the state by motion to quash, and has filed a return to the writ. There are no issues of fact.
From the files and records of this court it appears that on the fourteenth day of February, 1925, an application for a writ of habeas corpus was made by the prisoner to this court, upon the same facts, and that a writ was on that day regularly issued by the Chief Justice, returnable before Honorable William L.…
2Cited by10 opinions
- In Re ThompsonMontana Supreme Court · 1926
- In Re the Matter of HartMontana Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. BoothMontana Supreme Court · 1958
- Ex Parte ReinhardtMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- State Ex Rel. Graveley v. District Court of First Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.