Legal Opinion

Reid v. City of Mobile

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 11, 1925No. 1 Div. 338PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Appellant brought this suit against the city of Mobile to recover the purchase price of 54 volumes of the ordinances of the city enacted subsequent to the Municipal Code of 1907. Demurrer having been sustained to his original complaint and to the several counts thereof, as amended, plaintiff took a nonsuit on account of said adverse ruling on the pleadings, and prosecutes this appeal for a review of these rulings.

The resistance on the part of the city to the payment of the sum claimed rests chiefly upon the contention that the contract with plaintiff for these 54 volumes of the ordinances was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barrett v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  2. City of Mobile v. Mobile Electric Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  3. Grambs v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  4. McKinnon v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Montgomery County v. PruettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lee v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. City of Birmingham v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. City of Gadsden v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. City of Prichard v. MoultonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API