Legal Opinion

Grooms v. Walden Security

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided June 3, 2021No. 3:21-cv-00363Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION BELINDA MARY GROOMS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) No. 3:21-cv-00363 v. ) ) JUDGE RICHARDSON WALDEN SECURITY and ) TONI CROCKER, ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Belinda Mary Grooms filed a pro se Complaint against Walden Security and Toni Crocker under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. (Doc. No. 1.) Plaintiff also filed an application to proceed as a pauper. (Doc. No. 2.) The case is before the Court for a ruling on the application and initial review of the Complaint. APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED AS…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API