Kapelus v. A Joint Venture
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge:
The joint venture set forth in the caption is subject to a Chapter XI reorganization, one of the arrangements where the debtor goes on operating while the federal bankruptcy court keeps the creditors at bay, at least for a while.
The subject matter of this bankruptcy determination before the referee, the district court, and, now, here, is a valuable lot in Orange County, California. The bankruptcy proceedings were used to supersede a quiet title action in the state superior court of Orange County, California. Informally, the lot is known as the west half of the Katella…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Thompson v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Hughes Alonzo Robinson v. Tommy C. Mann, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Suhl v. BumbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Kaplan v. GuttmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fox v. Peck Iron and Metal Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1982
- In Re MaddenDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1975
- PIC Realty Corp. v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Rawlings v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1975
- Marvin B. Kapelus and Crenshaw Carpet Center, Inc. v. A Joint Venture or Co-Partnership Composed of Joseph J. Franklin, Marvin B. Kapelus and Crenshaw Carpet Center, Inc. v. A Joint Venture, or Co-Partnership Composed of Joseph J. FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.