Legal Opinion

Kapelus v. A Joint Venture

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 8, 1967No. 20991PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge:

The joint venture set forth in the caption is subject to a Chapter XI reorganization, one of the arrangements where the debtor goes on operating while the federal bankruptcy court keeps the creditors at bay, at least for a while.

The subject matter of this bankruptcy determination before the referee, the district court, and, now, here, is a valuable lot in Orange County, California. The bankruptcy proceedings were used to supersede a quiet title action in the state superior court of Orange County, California. Informally, the lot is known as the west half of the Katella…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Hughes Alonzo Robinson v. Tommy C. Mann, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  3. Suhl v. BumbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  4. Kaplan v. GuttmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fox v. Peck Iron and Metal Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1982
  2. In Re MaddenDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1975
  3. PIC Realty Corp. v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. Rawlings v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1975
  5. Marvin B. Kapelus and Crenshaw Carpet Center, Inc. v. A Joint Venture or Co-Partnership Composed of Joseph J. Franklin, Marvin B. Kapelus and Crenshaw Carpet Center, Inc. v. A Joint Venture, or Co-Partnership Composed of Joseph J. FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API