Legal Opinion

Josephs v. Marzan

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided August 22, 2024No. 0:21-cv-00749Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA MICHALEEN JOSEPHS, Civil No. 21-749 (JRT/DTS) Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM OPINION ALBERTO JOSE MARZAN and PRESS REQUESTING PROSECUTION MEDIA GROUP, INC., doing business FOR CRIMINAL CONTEMPT as VumaTV, Defendants. Caitlinrose H. Fisher and Matthew D. Forsgren, FORSGREN FISHER MCCALMONT DEMAREA TYSVER LLP, 225 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500, Minneapolis, MN 55402, for Plaintiff. Defendant Alberto Marzan is a serial fraudster who has largely managed to dodge accountability for victimizing individuals in the entertainment industry. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API