Legal Opinion
Heikkila v. Barber
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 27, 1953No. 426PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court 1
345 U.S. 229 (1953)
HEIKKILA
v.
BARBER, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF THE IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, ET AL.
No. 426.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued February 4-5, 1953.
Decided March 16, 1953.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.
Joseph Forer and Lloyd E. McMurray argued the cause for appellant. With them on the brief was Allan Brotsky.
Robert W. Ginnane argued the cause for Barber, appellee. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Cummings, Assistant Attorney General Murray, Beatrice Rosenberg and John R. Wilkins. Robert L. Stern, then…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Clark.
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Harisiades v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Fong Yue Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Bridges v. WixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001