Legal Opinion

Helgoe v. Bade

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

No errors relating to the findings of the jury upon the questions of negligence are claimed by appellant except those involved under his contentions that the defendant was not guilty of negligence as matter of law; that Stoll was guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law; that Helgoe was guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law; and that if Helgoe was not guilty he was not a guest *195but on a joint enterprise with Stoll, and Stoll’s negligence is imputable to him. The last point need not be considered if Stoll was not negligent.

The defendant’s automobile was parked on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Duby v. Columbia CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cherney v. SimonisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Lipinski v. PakulskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Hunt v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API